❋ Cheerleader for the SAFE Board of Directors, or advocate for all SAFE members and guardian of the laws of California?
✅ If you've been following this sad saga for a while you know that: The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) has final decision authority on the the SAFE Credit Union Board's proposal to merge with Boeing Employees Credit Union of Washington State. But, you may have missed the key point!
✔ California law states that a majority of all SAFE members must vote in favor of the merger proposal for it to be approved. If a majority of all 245,000 SAFE members do not vote in favor of merger, the merger is not approved! [Got that?]
✅ End of story? Not quite! Any final decision authority by DFPI occurs only after the legally required vote by all the members of SAFE CU. DFPI does not approve a merger proposal in advance of a member vote, although the SAFE Board may seek to imply that it does. [Same sleight of hand SAFE used with that phrase "definitive agreement"!]
✔ So, DFPI by California law may overrule a vote of disapproval by the majority of SAFE members!
😎 Can you think of any reason for DFPI to cheerlead on behalf of the SAFE Board over the objections of a majority - 122,500+ - of SAFE member-owners?
Well, why not just ask DFPI now if it will overrule a SAFE member vote... and why?
