Or is it a bit too IRkSome?
One of the softball questions submitted for response at the Annual meeting is:
✔ "4. Why doesn't the Board publish our monthly financial statements online? Is there a problem?" [See Part II - link]. Which prompted a trollish response: "4) if you really need to see them monthly you can request them. (Members rarely do, by the way)"
Not certain why the SECU Board continues to adopt a disdainful attitude toward SECU members on such a non-controversial issue - especially when member access to financial information is mandated by North Carolina law? (Why not get modern - "Go Digital!")
✅ Why play hardball with SECU members on such a simple issue? Well, what goes around, comes around! Here's another question which a member submitted for response at the Annual meeting this week:
✔ "Would you please explain the $26.5 million, non-recourse loan granted by the Board to CEO Leigh Brady, which was reported to the IRS.?"
Say what? SECU is required to file an annual tax return (called a "990-T") with the IRS. Yes, that's right - even though SECU is tax-exempt. Key IRS goals are to track the scope of financial activity, major third party contracts, levels of executive compensation, and to monitor for potential conflicts of interests. [take a look at the full 2025 SECU 990-T here].
Here's what the member is questioning:
"THE CREDIT UNION HAS A SERP PLAN FOR KEY EXECUTIVES. DURING FISCAL YEAR 2025, A N0N-RECOURSE LOAN WAS GRANTED TO LEIGH BRADY, PRESIDENT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,500,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF SPLIT DOLLAR LIFE INSURANCE.
😎 The SECU Board wasn't real forthcoming about its loan of $6.5 million to the former CEO (still owed as you can see) - which caused a firestorm of critique. Perhaps this year's response on the $26.5 million CEO loan will be clearer - and more convincing!
Lets hope so... wonder if it's a "risk-based" loan?