Wednesday, January 31, 2024

SECU Financials: Yearend - December 31, 2023: Working Out As Planned?

As the SECU membership breathlessly awaits the Board's 2024 Strategic Plan (we're now entering the second month of 2024 without a plan, is that a problem?), it might be useful to review the results of the 2023 Legacy Board's Strategic Plan [here's a link to the 2023 plan].

Lots of ways to judge the effectiveness of the 2023 Legacy Board Strategic Plan at year end. But, one simple view is to look at the Board's own "scorecard": Here it is from the SECU financial statements:

 

😎 Of course transparency continues to be a concern "in many things SECU" over the last 2 years. 

Easy example is that SECU has borrowed $5 billion from the Federal Reserve at year end 2023 (to take advantage of a Federal government handout). Guess that's okay (though never done in the past), but you'll note that many of the Legacy Board's 2023 "targets" are ratios based on assets ("expense compared to assets" ratio, for example.) Inflating assets with that extra borrowed $5 billion changes the numbers, quite substantially in many cases. Will show you "the adjusted" ratios, too (without the $5 billion handout loan). For the record, SECU reported @ $54.6 billion in total assets at 12/31/2023, so the "adjusted ratios" will be based on $49.6 billion in total assets (less the $5 billion loan, okay?)

So here are your adjusted ratio numbers:

1) Capital-to-Assets - Reported 10.23%, adjusted 11.26%, target 9.0%. The Board is 2.26% over target (not even in range!), which means the Legacy Board is withholding unnecessarily $1.12 billion ($49.6 assets x 2.26%) in excess capital which could have been paid out to members in 2023. That's why members are not receiving a market return on their SECU savings accounts. $1.2 billion lost to the N.C. economy. 

2) Expense-to-Assets  - Reported 2.20%, adjusted 2.42%, target 2.00%. The Board is .42% over its own budget target of 2.00% - which is @ 25% over budget (2.42%/2.00%) - or over budget by $208 million! This is the highest expense ratio in the history of SECU.

3) Return-on-Assets - Reported .44%, adjusted .48%, target .50%. About on target, still with goal of "record profits"?

4) Loan-to-Deposits - Reported 75%, adjusted 80%, target 75%.  On target.

5) 3+ Month Delinquency - Anyway you want to calculate it, the worst reported delinquency in the history of SECU.

6) Net Loan Charge-offs - Anyway you want to calculate it, the worst reported loan losses in the history of SECU.

7) Asset Growth - Reported + 7.07, adjusted -2.7%, target + 4.50%. After adjusting for the Fed loan, the Legacy SECU Board is off their growth target by -7.2%.

 

... unbelievable!?

 

47 comments:

  1. "Federal government handout..." they usually come with a caveat ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I’m from the government and I’m here to help."
      Ronald Reagan

      Delete
  2. Mr. Blaine can you clarify the borrowing over 4th quarter 2023? Was the $5b different than previous months? Has SECU borrowed like that in years past? Basically is my paycheck backed by loan proceeds? Thank you for explaining to a non accountant employee.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm guessing raises for all C-Suites with this performance!!!
    If you watched 'Inside Job' you wouldn't think that was an insane comment ....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. Along with all these raises for BS promotions lately for higher ups! While everyone else is on promotional freeze. Someone please explain why.

      Delete
  4. Interested to know how you determined all of the “worst in SECU history” statements.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @2:05 Could be he understands and knows how to read financial statements? Regret to inform you, financial institution's records do not disappear into thin air, even though This Board and SECU's Administration would like for their last three years financials to disappear. They all own these failures.

      Delete
    2. Well, you may have caught me on that one! My explicit knowledge of SECU's financial data only goes back to 1970; so a more accurate statement would be "the worst delinquency and charge offs in over 50 years". I apologize to readers for the exaggeration.

      BTW if you would like to become more knowledgeable, or do your own fact checking, this post:[ https://www.secujustasking.com/2023/07/secu-june2023-yearend-financials-end-of.html] gives you directions on how to access the quarterly financial data filed by SECU with the federal govt. (NCUA). ... SECU's charter # is 66310. But NCUA only goes back to 2004!

      'Course SECU has all the data since 1937 if you want to ask them...

      Delete
    3. ...and add "worst expense ratio in over 50 years"... apologize for the omission.

      Delete
    4. Would you care to provide how you determined the data from the last 50 years? By memory of monthly financial starements from the past 50 years? You really remember a financial statement from when you were in your 20s and weren’t CEO?

      Delete
    5. Must be nice to have an eidetic memory.

      Delete
    6. Did you mean idiotic memory rather than eidetic memory? Was that a typo?!

      As to the poor anonymouse, about having a 50 year history on what actually occurred at SECU? Yep, sorry to offend your ignorance, but yes I do have that expertise. That's why this blog is such a problem to the "don't care about the truth crowd"...

      Suck it up, you have to confront the facts...

      Delete
    7. Poor mouse, she must be licking Leigh's cheese.

      Delete
    8. amen to that. And go look at the stats in the financials when Blaine and Lord were running SECU. Even in the worst of years,( Volcker interest rates, 2008 meltdown, pandemic of 21) the credit union thrived, and took care of members through best employees in NC. Now the "hard times" are self inflicted by an ignorant board and should know better CEO. # 4 in 24

      Delete
    9. Kristina Ray are you paying attention? Or are you doing the deck chairs on board the Titanic?

      Delete
    10. Like that "should know better CEO" comment - biggest disappointment ever! No difference now than when Hayes was running around like a loose cannon. I guess the pause and giving thought approach for a better direction did not work...

      Delete
  5. WOW! As stewards of the organization it would seem appropriate for the Legacy 8 and CEO to resign and admit their failure. Instead they try to cover it up.

    If you still don't think the credit union needs new leadership just keep reading this post over and over until it sinks in.

    You have to assume CFO Spivey explained all this to the CEO and Board. Right Rex?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Other than trying to make the numbers look better, what would be the other reason they would take those loans from the Fed? I’m trying to play devils advocate and figure out the “excuse”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. maybe the Fed offered to "Help" ... ;)

      Delete
    2. Because they’re making more on the investments they’re buying with the loan proceeds than they are paying in interest on the loan. Cost of funds is the cost of funds, whether you’re paying dividends on share accounts or interest on a Fed line of credit.

      Delete
  7. This is industry standard. Mediocre. Mediocre board, Mediocre administration. But. Everyone is operating in good faith. Whatever the hell that means. Oh, Sorry Performance. Sorry Performance on the goals Brady-Hayes and the Notorious Eight set for SECU. Resignations from ALL are overdue. these people are not as smart as they believe they are. How can we get through to them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mediocrity? More in '24? Can't wait for the new Strat Plan. Will be hard to top 2023 for the Leg 8 Board. Bet they'll screw us over more - "More in '24"?!

      Delete
    2. 'they' have become addicted to excuses ...

      Delete
    3. They are a lost cause, there is no getting through to them. More important to get through to every other Member about the damage done by them since 2021. Taking from us to profit themselves and weakening the credit union daily is the only areas where they have been successful.

      Delete
    4. Addicted to excuses?... think that's part of the problem - no apologies, no retractions, no humility just "We Are SECU"...self selfie love by leg board? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcATvu5f9vE

      Delete
    5. no doubt "we're in deep"

      Delete
    6. Selfie love and Greed can dig a deep hole

      Delete
  8. Where are those cash guns when we need them? The yacht is listing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sell the yatcht. Get the bonus back from Hayes. Get a refund from the Hawaii trip. All the 1st class flights. Massive spending on tech and we might be able to get back on track!

      Delete
  9. The Board may not realize it, but they are well beyond the protection of the "prudent man theory"...personal liability/assets are now on the line...the numbers self-indict the Board. Gross negligence,undeniable..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oust the 4! Brinson and Wooten betrayed the employees and members. S. Williams doesn't seem to have a clue..should bail before disaster.

      Fleming is special, f-upped BCBS, now doing same at SECU - egotistical, no brainer. Gym's selfie avatar. By far worst of bunch.

      Delete
  10. Leigh've - now! Please!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why doesn't somebody just say it, this board sucks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sucks is an understatement. They are a CANCER

      Delete
  12. Coming soon to a branch near you, we back the tellers - https://www.wral.com/story/parents-rally-behind-durham-teacher-movement-in-sign-of-solidarity/21261933/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. #StandWithTheTellers #SayNoToRelationshipBanking. Tellers aren’t greeters. Let them show their skill set and not reduce to cut labor costs

      Delete
  13. #NoToAutomatingTellers #ITMSCantReplaceTheHumamTouch

    ReplyDelete
  14. Do not reduce our tellers to “greeters”, Ms. Brady.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It makes my heart happy to see support for "just tellers". We don't want to be phased out - we just want to continue to serve our membership as we always have. Not everyone wants a digital experience. Especially with all the app/online issues we've been having. People like human interaction and the "personal banker" experience. (We hear that quite often from the membership.) We are well aware that Poor Leigh and the "Legacy 8" don't care about anyone but themselves. We, as a "Legacy Crew", can stick together and fight for OUR SECU!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No marketing team ever can compete with SECU Tellers/Financial Services Representatives for promoting credit union services and key word here "relationships" with the Members. That marketing approach helped to make SECU a leader in the credit union world without costing us members an extra dime. I just have to ask, how can these SECU leaders screw something up so badly in just three years?

      Delete
  16. #HireMoreTellers #LayoffTheBoard

    ReplyDelete
  17. Relationship banking jobs are nothing more than a joke folks. Might as well take your hard earned degree and work at McDonalds because you will be making McDonald’s money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. one step closer to not needing employees'

      Delete
  18. I’m not saying soon but I’m sure tellers will slowly be needed less because of technology. Prolly be a while before phased out completely.

    ReplyDelete