The Infinite Loop!
... always gives you the "same old, same old"!
😎 The attempt to perpetuate one’s time on the Board and then referring to one’s experience as the basis for continuation is a bit silly and at some point becomes worrisome.
This is the common justification for renominating current board members to fill annual vacancies in credit union elections.
✅ The State Employees Credit Union board’s nominating committee recommended the four incumbent directors be re-elected, The committee nominateded only these four current Board members, although 11 qualified members applied:
❋ Incumbent McKinley Wooten, an assistant secretary of the N.C. Department of Revenue, who has been a director since 2000.
❋ Incumbent Bob Brinson, a retired state information technology employee and a director since 2007.
❋ Incumbent Mark Fleming, a retired former vice president of government relations at Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina. He’s been a director since 2019.
❋ Incumbent Stelfanie Williams, a Duke University administrator who has been a director since 2017.
😎 Knowing when it’s time to leave is as important a skill as serving in the position in the first place.
If you would like a set of candidate petitions to sign:
👉email: secu4in24@gmail.com
Let the SECU members choose!
... haven't we seen this same problem recently in national politics... sometimes you just need to help them find the door!
These Joes need to go!
ReplyDeleteRenoming diversity- lawyers, lobbyists and liaisons. cronies need to go.
ReplyDelete"McKinley Wooten, an assistant secretary of the N.C. Department of Revenue, who has been a director since 2000."
ReplyDeleteWOW Making a career out of this ... !!!
the pols have had to take care of him for years.. that's why he's had to bounce around, stay ahead of his lack of performance. /nice smile though.
DeleteLet's get into the weeds here a little about how important this next board will be. When LGFCU leaves, how much money goes away with that? Also, what other income goes away the end of this year? How much fat is there to trim or cut due to this? It seems no one can even get the MLO stuff right. How long have we been waiting on that change to happen? It is very simple. Before I got promoted I did EVERYTHING other than being a teller everyday! All Leigh has to do is say you are back under the branch now go help all your members. Now to cutting fat. How many of the newer positions can be cut? Do we really need a marketing department? Do we really need Jared, as someone mentioned as to what his role is? Mr. Applequist is perfectly capable of heading up the branches. Change is inevitable and not all the changes have been bad. Someone just needs to listen to the employees. Hopefully the new 4 will if elected.
ReplyDeleteGood, since you are advocating for layoffs then you won’t be surprised when you are fired for insubordination.
DeleteHey @8:50, a little bitter about having to go back to work for a living?
Delete@12:05, if you think only branch and contact center employees work for a living, then you live in an alternate reality.
Deletewe are getting desperate in the branches. help!
ReplyDeleteIt's desperate everywhere if you don't have "executive" in your job title.
DeleteHave to pay back the loan that fattened up the bottom line so the numbers looked better. when is that? october?
ReplyDeleteThen what happens to the numbers?
DeleteAll the ratios get much worse.
Deletethey'll blame ML .... or creative accounting practices (CAP) (our new/new in this world) or ... etc ... you get the picture
DeleteLeap year! Don't forget Leap Year. I'm sure it is all in good faith.
DeleteThey said we made on this that would be passed onto members. Why would there be blame?
DeleteTerm limits for board members is a very simple concept, and is widely recognized as a best practice. The second largest credit union in the country doesn't have this in place?! Very surprising...
ReplyDeleteAre employees merit raises really being lowered? Why don’t you cut the top heavy salary’s at the top firs? If this is true, morale will sink even lower.
ReplyDeleteNo one has told us at the bottom.
DeleteYes. Managers, VPs and SVPs were asked to hold 2, 3 or 4% of total merit allocation.
DeleteWhat was the reasoning behind holding the merit allocation?
DeleteThat has been standard for many branches/departments for years. Nothing new. What was new was the lack of communication until the very end of the process.
Delete"Managers, VPs and SVPs were asked to hold 2, 3 or 4% of total merit allocation." What does that mean?
Deletesound familiar ...
ReplyDeleteAnalysis-Southwest Airlines to end its brand-defining open-seating policy... Oh there's more ...
https://www.fidelity.com/news/article/top-news/202407291405RTRSNEWSCOMBINED_KBN39F1EP-OUSBS_1
Are we getting that $1000 bonus this year? We were told the Board would vote on it every year.
ReplyDeleteWe aren’t worthy. They need a special retreat trip so no bonus for the working class.
DeleteWalk out August 2nd.
DeleteEmail this to all employees from all employees email
Delete