Thursday, September 5, 2024

Incumbent Board Member Can't Seem To Make Up His Mind About SEANC

   ... Clear direction?

✅ The only SECU incumbent board candidate who is a member of SEANC was touting his endorsement today on LinkedIn:

 

✅ But in a personal appeal letter to his friends two days ago, he had this to say: 

From: Mark Fleming <flemingibx@yahoo.com>

Date: Tue, Sep 3, 2024
Subject: SECU Board Elections
To: xxxxxxxxx


Dear xxxxxx,

I am honored to serve on the SECU Board since 2019. I am writing you today to ask if you would please go on line today and vote for the four incumbents running for the SECU Board of Directors. This is a critical vote and the first time the SECU has ever had to mail out ballots to all eligible SECU members in the long and great history of our credit union. The reason why your vote for the incumbents is critical - this vote will determine if SECU moves forward and succeeds in our fast changing world.

Four board members are up for reelection and have been recommended and nominated by the SECU Nominating Committee – Bob Brinson, Mark Fleming, Stelfanie Williams and McKinley Wooten. I have been honored to serve with these three, we are all former or current state employees - the SECU Nominating Committee interviewed all candidates that applied to be on the Board and these four were highly recommended by the Nominating Committee.

SEANC and some disgruntled former employees are working to unseat the four candidates who have been recommended by SECU. They have been spreading misinformation and untruths. They are unhappy with the forward-looking changes that the board has made, including: updating IT; instituting more digital options; adding tier-based lending which is the standard among credit unions; and even allowing the SECU employees to not wear ties if they want! .......

I sincerely appreciate your support and your vote for the four incumbents.
Thank you, Mark
 
Let's hope he's right about SEANC's real intentions!
 
 
 
 
 

 

36 comments:

  1. Current employees want the incumbents gone! What is he talking about?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The want from employees is to see 4 new Board Members this year!

      Delete
  2. Take a look at Andrew’s federal credit Union. One teller per branch maybe….

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mark Fleming sounds like an old boomer who hasn’t left his penthouse in years and spoke to real people…

    ReplyDelete
  4. Damien Carter endorsing the member nominated candidates is all you need to know folks! Debunk him! Dare you! Convince me Mr. Carter doesn’t have the credit unions best interest over some retired VP from Blue Cross Blue Shield….please comment below Leigh and company. I want to hear an argument against Mr. Carter who was an astounding worker for the credit union for years!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree, have often wondered if he opposed a lot of the changes and retired a bit sooner than planned….

      Delete
    2. I felt the same when I saw Mary Ann Rice on the list. All I need to know.

      Delete
  5. Seanc spreading misinformation and untruths?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he meant his endorsement!

      Delete
    2. should have had one less drink before hitting the send key.

      Delete
  6. "...the forward-looking changes that the board has made." Still at it! Resurrecting the no new technology since 1983! Everybody else does it! Geez. Tired old arguments. Let's look at the call reports, Mark! How are you doing with actually running a business? Bragging about profits at a non-profit. Sounds like you want to be a bank!

    ReplyDelete
  7. sounds like desperation in his "voice" ... he should go 'find his passion' somewhere else ... the CU isn't it obviously ....

    ReplyDelete
  8. "They have been spreading misinformation and untruths."
    This has become a tired and lazy way of avoiding discussing policy. If you want to discuss CU policy open the floor for discussion at the next meeting instead of silencing those you don't agree with ... The board chooses to hide in the shadows refusing to acknowledge failures that they created. (Boy does this sound familiar)
    It all started with Gym (your hire) and it's just continued to go downhill...
    It's time for new leadership on the board.
    * 4 more in 24 *

    ReplyDelete
  9. "adding tier-based lending which is the standard among credit unions"

    So Standard and Mediocre is what they aspire to now-a-days .... well got to give em credit they achieved both... problem is we can do better, MUCH better ...

    Time for a change...

    Vote for  

    Jean Blaine - Susie Ford - Julian Hawes - Kirby Parrish

    make the SECU the shinning light on the hill again!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susanne Schenk WattsSeptember 7, 2024 at 8:39 PM

      Just because RBL is "standard" at most CUs doesn't mean SECU should jump on the band wagon. It's the idea of "doing the right thing" and treating every member the same that made SECU stand out.

      Delete
  10. Disgruntled? Try passionate, devoted and concerned long-time employees who care about people. Why don't the opinions of long-time senior management matter to the Board or CEO? Somebody needs to remember whose money they are spending! I wish I knew who decided that the 2nd largest credit union in the nation needed fixing. Charity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! Why do they keep saying "former". I am a current employee, and there are many, many fellow current employees who also want to get back to our core values.

      Delete
  11. "and even allowing the SECU employees to not wear ties if they want! ......"

    I bet this helps those who can't get a loan from your policies sleep better at night ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hated wearing ties but I'll gladly do it instead of working for these clowns much longer.

      Delete
    2. Agree with you 100%!

      Delete
  12. Why beg so bad for a position that doesn't pay? Why not walk away instead of dealing with a bad batch of people who do not appreciate or value him like he claims? Why not enjoy his retirement in peace? Why go through all this trouble? What's the incentive?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Why not enjoy his retirement in peace?"

      Lol, ironic

      Delete
    2. I would be interested to hear his answer to your question. He is one of the 11 who saddled SECU with the six million dollar mistake called Hayes and all that followed - that one decision cost all the incumbents my vote.
      Our votes have been cast for the four member nominated candidates - 4 in 24.

      Delete
    3. They have financial incentives for the incumbents to win. More than likely being pressured by organizations that oversee financial institutions and they want secu to be a standard institution essentially. Can’t have a member owned co-cop with equal interest rates for all and that doesn’t have a hire/fire environment for its employees!

      Delete
  13. sorry sir, but we got new sheriffs in town ...

    Jean Blaine - Susie Ford - Julian Hawes - Kirby Parrish

    pack your crew up and saddle on outta here!

    ReplyDelete
  14. "the first time the SECU has ever had to mail out ballots to all eligible SECU members in the long and great history of our credit union."
    Mark Flemming, who chose to do this mailing to 2.7 million @ 0.69 / envelope? Wasting our credit union .
    money to try and increase votes for the incumbents. The entire ballot wording and setup was made to favor incumbents and you have the audacity to question the integrity of SECU's former employees. And by the way, I
    see where SEANC has endorsed several candidates for NC State Elections in November - but I can not find a SEANC endorsement for the SECU board election?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There goes another 1.7 million dollars

      Delete
    2. But yet we can’t give our hard working employees bonuses but we sure can shore up 6 million for Jim Hayes who probably never even logged onto Margo…

      Delete
    3. The waste and losses this Board and Executive team's decisions have caused the credit union over the past three years. In person and online voting gave every member the opportunity to cast their vote, why the need to change the rules again? More waste of our money.

      Delete
    4. "... Jim Hayes who probably never even logged onto Margo…"

      He thought Margo was a legacy employee and wanted them to go elsewhere and 'find their passion"....

      Delete
  15. oh, lord this means we get another 4pager from the boss lady "explaining things" tomorrow. Somebody save us!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I love how rich retired VPs at other corporations love to stick their nose into the credit unions business. Like who are you dude? You think you have the respect from workers across secu? You don’t speak for us? Just sit down and shut up and stay out of our business. We know mark fleming more than likely has financial incentives for this board to win….can’t wait to send these people packing and hopefully by next year we will be getting a new ceo.

    ReplyDelete
  17. https://secuforall.com/

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://www.theassemblync.com/business/secu-credit-union-vote/

    ReplyDelete