Monday, July 15, 2024

We Interrupt This Program For An Important Message For SECU Retirees...

   

                  #1 Survey Question!

Are the SECU Board and SECU Retirees Being Misled? 

😎 Earlier this month ran a series of posts on proposed changes by the SECU Board of Directors to the existing health benefits for retired SECU employees and their dependents - several hundred in number. [links 7/5; 7/6; 7/7; 7/8] The 7/8/2024 post alone elicited a rage of 78 comments - the still unannounced and unpublished SECU Board plan is causing quite a stir!

Had moved on to other topics, but got this yesterday:    

 ✅ "I know you said you were done posting about medical coverage changes but would you consider including this in a post?"

"SECU asked a group of retirees some time ago to be a part of a newly formed Retiree Advisory Group. The Group has had 2 meetings (February 29, 2024 and May 1, 2024).  At the first meeting it was made clear it was an advisory group only - no authority to approve, negotiate, etc. That’s why they chose the Group name not Committee, to make that clear and keep it informal."

"Specifically the Group was asked to provide input on changes to retiree medical benefits. The Group had nothing to do with the decision to change retiree medical benefits and nothing to do with the basic design of the new retiree medical benefits plan. It was clear that those decisions had already been made."

"The Group was presented with the new plan and asked to provide input and share concerns. The Group made several recommendations based on their concerns and the information provided to them. Some of those recommendations were considered and some were not.  There has been no final decision made on the items moved forward for consideration."

"Again, the Retiree Advisory Group did not, as a group, endorse the change to retiree medical benefits nor the decision as to how the new benefit would be structured. Whether any changes will be made to the new plan based on the Group’s input has yet to be communicated."

"There has been no communication between or after meetings with the entire group."

😎 I have talked with several members of the Retiree Advisory Group and confirmed the statement above. The concern now being expressed is that the Executive Leadership Team is implying to the SECU Board that the Retiree Group fully supports the proposed changes for all SECU retirees and their dependents. It is clear that is not a true statement. 

The Retiree Advisory Group was told the plan changes would be announced in June, 2024 - that deadline is now past. The changes for all retirees and dependents are scheduled to begin January, 1, 2025 - but are yet to be announced, a courtesy which could have occurred back in February. 

SECU is proposing to move all employees to a new health plan as of January 1, 2026. Given the lack of information available to retirees, it would appear prudent for the SECU Board to defer this change until that 2026 date.

😎 The SECU Board has been roundly critiqued for an improbable CEO selection, non-competitive savings rates, rapidly rising operational costs, risk-based lending, soaring delinquency and record setting loan losses. Both staff and members point to steep declines in the quality of service.

But the concern so urgently expressed by the Retiree Group member is of a different nature. That concern is that the SECU Board is being misled. Incomplete or inaccurate information can lead all of us into bad decisions.

The SECU Board should verify its information carefully. 

   ... no need to rush into an unforced error, is there?



 


14 comments:

  1. Upper management is only interested in being surrounded by Yes Men! No push back, no debate! That Leadership always fails. I thought we hired a consultant firm? Surely they would’ve acknowledged this as an issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Videri quam esse (to seem rather than to be)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Has anyone in this Group emailed the Board members to let them know they do not support this change?

    ReplyDelete
  4. On a good note, they approved merit raises this year... surprisingly!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. approving and giving is two separate acts ...

      the folks at the top (high priority) will certainly garner the majority of the funds allocated ...
      the rest (low priority) get what's left over ...
      kinda like tiding for most of us ...

      Delete
    2. manual correction ... tithing

      Delete
  5. Given the number of ill conceived decisions that have been made over the past three years, I'd guess this wasn't the first time they were misled. But I'm sure the misrepresentations were always "in good faith".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Loan Admin does not play by the rules and is not held accountable!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure what that means. Kind of an open-ended condemnation... any specifics?

      Delete
    2. Facts don’t matter

      Delete
    3. Collections for one or lack of collections more like it. You should see the gaps in collections. If they were audited there would be or should be some serious questions asked.

      Delete
    4. Or another example could be the fiasco of moving specialists (MLOs) that were supposedly being managed by Loan Administration. Nope, that didn't work so now the they are taking an about face and putting MLOs back under branch management. I understand there will be mistakes but you'd think there would be some accountability for such missteps. Quite the contrary. Executive level promotions in Loan Administration announced just last week. Who knows...maybe the promotions were for the resounding success of the five-tier RBL structure?

      Delete
    5. What about the executive who in the recent executive team call couldn’t stop laughing and said “I swear I haven’t ate a gummy”— no one watching was laughing I can guarantee that

      Delete
    6. I am glad they let the peasant watch now days

      Delete