Tuesday, November 11, 2025

SECU Member Participation In Their Cooperative Shouldn't Be So Difficult, But...

    ... keep moving forward.

To: "BRADY, LEIGH" <Leigh.Brady@ncsecu.org>
        November 11, 2025

Re: Request for "Special Meeting" Procedures and Guidelines

Dear Leigh Brady,

Would you please forward to me the instructions for calling a "Special Meeting" as prescribed in the SECU bylaws. Can not find them online, nor do the branches have copies. Please let me know where those procedures are available to the SECU membership?

As you know, several attempts have been made over the last year to find a reasonable way to present you and the SECU Board with current and future credit union governance concerns. Unfortunately, no simple, straight-forward path has been found.

Ms. Plaut, chief legal officer at SECU, has ruled in her August 20, 2025 letter [see full copy below] that the SECU bylaws provide the mechanism for any SECU member to submit a resolution: 

"SECU's bylaws do provide a mechanism for a member to present resolutions to the membership by arranging for a special meeting. See Article VIII, Section 4. You or any other member may arrange for a special meeting of the members as provided in the bylaws."

Therefore, would you please send the instructions on how to proceed.

For your information, the two issues which I believe need to be addressed are the rights of SECU members in the event of 1) merger, and/or 2) charter conversion. These two important credit union governance changes are occurring with increasing frequency nationwide - among credit unions, large and small alike.

You may not be aware, but these two issues have arisen in the past to threaten the cooperative, nonprofit structure of credit unions. In 2005, several credit unions pushed for the ability to convert to for-profit banks (a good example was $1.4 billion Community Credit Union in Plano, Texas, which converted to ViewPoint Bank). In the conversion transactions, it became clear that the vast majority of regular members were deprived of their rightful share of the market value of the credit union. 

SECU, along with many other credit unions and regulators, worked hard to strengthen the rules which governed such conversions. New requirements were adopted to better assure that the membership would be better informed and fairly compensated in these transactions. 

With the recent advent of mega-mergers, bank purchases, open membership, and insider payouts, these issues have arisen again and need to be revisited. The stakes are much, much higher now than in 2005! Members are not receiving the full and fair disclosure required for an informed vote on the transaction. 

You and the SECU Board could provide tremendous leadership for credit unions by discussing, reviewing, and adopting appropriate governance rules protecting SECU members.  Past and recent history clearly show that positive risk management procedures on these governance issues need to be firmly in place . 

It had been hoped that these resolutions could be brought to your attention for consideration without difficulty. But, if a "Special Meeting" is the only acceptable mechanism under the bylaws, then that course can be pursued.
  
SECU has over 3 million members, a market value well-in-excess of $ 6+ billion; and is a key employer and positive economic engine for North Carolina. Each SECU member has an individual pro-rata interest in the $6+ billion market value of the credit union. Their future interests should be fully and fairly protected. There is much to be lost.

Look forward to receiving the procedures and guidance from you shortly. Happy to discuss these concerns, or any other alternatives you might suggest to a "Special Meeting". 

Thank you.

Sincerely,  Jim Blaine - SECU member

 See if the "buck stops"... where it should!

__________________________________________________
Via Email Ms. Cathie Plaut, Chief Legal Officer,  SECU

August 20, 2025
James C. Blaine 

Re: Annual Meeting Inquiry 

Dear Mr. Blaine:

"Thank you for your inquiry on August 15, 2025. You inquired if significant SECU member resolutions involving the governance of SECU may be submitted for inclusion in the Notice of the 2025 Annual Meeting. The purpose of the Annual Meeting is for members to elect directors. While the rules for the 2025 Annual Meeting have not yet been adopted, the rules for recent Annual Meetings have permitted members the opportunity to speak or submit questions - but there was no process to allow members to introduce resolutions for consideration at the Annual Meeting.


SECU's bylaws do provide a mechanism for a member to present resolutions to the membership by arranging for a special meeting.
See Article VIII, Section 4. You or any other member may arrange for a special meeting of the members as provided in the bylaws.


SECU members possess a defined set of member rights; those rights stem from the governing North Carolina statutes and from the SECU bylaws. Neither source provides a right for members to present resolutions to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. The North Carolina credit union statute requires only that the annual meeting and any special meetings of members be "held at the time, place, and in the manner indicated by the bylaws." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 54-109.31(a). The SECU bylaws similarly do not require SECU to offer the opportunity for member-sponsored resolutions to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. See Bylaws, Article VIII, Section 6 (noting that the order of business, format, and conduct of the meeting are subject to such policies and procedures as the Board of Directors adopts).


Allowing member resolutions would be inconsistent with the system of governance established by the SECU bylaws. The bylaws provide that "the board shall have the general direction and control of the affairs of this credit union." See Bylaws, Article X, Section 4; see also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 54-109.41 ("The board of directors shall have the general direction of the business affairs, funds, and records of the credit union."). Allowing member resolutions related to the governance or operations of a credit union would usurp the role of the Board of Directors who have been elected by its members to direct and control the affairs of SECU.


We hope this information is helpful, and we thank you for being a valued member-owner of SECU."

-CP
  
  

 

9 comments:

  1. I pray we have a leader of integrity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we are over lawyered and woefully underled.

      Delete
    2. I promise you that eliminating the legal dept like these comments imply would actually lead to the implosion of SECU. But go ahead, it’s why yall want to see anyway (just so you can say “I was right”)

      Delete
  2. What caused Leigh to lose her integrity in your eyes @6pm?

    ReplyDelete
  3. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires ...

    unfortunately, this appears to happen everywhere you look ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 7:17, not sure how this has anything to do with SECU whatsoever, but whatev. Seems like you're missing a citation.

      Delete
  4. Maintaining trust is much easier that regaining it...

    ReplyDelete
  5. “The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear… They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying. Lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else… It’s called the American Dream, ‘cause you have to be asleep to believe it.”—George Carlin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As Reuters reports, “It also means that lawmakers often spend more time listening to the concerns of the wealthy than anyone else.”
      sound familiar ... just business as usual ... no unicorns allowed here, move along ...

      Delete