Please lay out your actual accusation. She was asked if there were bylaw changes and she said no. You seem to have additional information. Reply jim blaineNovember 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
2:26 pm Believe what you say is entirely not true! You don't seem to "get it"!
And, in fact you set Leigh up for the kill when you claim "she said no"! That's not what she said at all! If she did say that there were no amendments approved by the SECU Board in September, 2025 then she is a bald-faced liar - no if's, and's, or but's!
Personally, I don't think Ms. Brady lies...that's certainly not my experience from working with her over several decades.
The problem is not that Leigh is lying, it's that she has chosen to not tell the truth.The ethics between lying and not telling the truth is an interesting debate for all of us.
The core question over the last 3 years, has been why our CEO and Board would choose not to tell the SECU membership the truth on governance issues? What's going on?
It appears that Ms. Brady, over the last 3 years has consistently received inept internal "legal" advice, which keeps leading her and the SECU Board up blind alleys of "incredibility".
If Ms. Brady would just tell it like she sees it and why, then the issues can be openly discussed, resolved, and everyone can move on.
But don't criticize the lawyers! Poor, ineffective advice is not unusual!
But the choice of whether or not to take such advice is the CEO's. Her choice, her decision, her judgment, her reputation for honesty and integrity - her legacy..
The CEO owns this problem.... and she knows the truth.
Leader? Or not up to the task? Stay tuned... Reply
AnonymousNovember 1, 2025 at 12:26 PM
ReplyDeletePlease lay out your actual accusation. She was asked if there were bylaw changes and she said no. You seem to have additional information.
Reply
jim blaineNovember 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
2:26 pm Believe what you say is entirely not true! You don't seem to "get it"!
And, in fact you set Leigh up for the kill when you claim "she said no"! That's not what she said at all! If she did say that there were no amendments approved by the SECU Board in September, 2025 then she is a bald-faced liar - no if's, and's, or but's!
Personally, I don't think Ms. Brady lies...that's certainly not my experience from working with her over several decades.
The problem is not that Leigh is lying, it's that she has chosen to not tell the truth.The ethics between lying and not telling the truth is an interesting debate for all of us.
The core question over the last 3 years, has been why our CEO and Board would choose not to tell the SECU membership the truth on governance issues? What's going on?
It appears that Ms. Brady, over the last 3 years has consistently received inept internal "legal" advice, which keeps leading her and the SECU Board up blind alleys of "incredibility".
If Ms. Brady would just tell it like she sees it and why, then the issues can be openly discussed, resolved, and everyone can move on.
But don't criticize the lawyers! Poor, ineffective advice is not unusual!
But the choice of whether or not to take such advice is the CEO's. Her choice, her decision, her judgment, her reputation for honesty and integrity - her legacy..
The CEO owns this problem.... and she knows the truth.
Leader? Or not up to the task? Stay tuned...
Reply
Any answer from advisory boards ?
ReplyDelete