Friday, November 14, 2025

Second Request To Leigh Brady, SECU CEO, For "Special Meeting" Procedures

  ... getting a signal?

✅ Dear Leigh Brady,

In response to my email to you on November 11, 2025 [link], I received today the following response:

✵ 11/14/2025 - From: Member Resolutions <member.resoltions@ncsecu

"Mr. Blaine:

Thank you for your message to SECU CEO/President Leigh Brady. Your correspondence has been forwarded to SECU’s Member Resolutions department. We have documented your complaint and will respond as soon as possible. Please allow up to ten (10) business days to complete our investigation and respond. Thank you for being a valued member of SECU!"

The request of you on 11/11/2025 was simply to send me a copy of the procedures for calling a "Special Meeting" as prescribed in the SECU bylaws. Clearly I did not file a complaint.   

According to the ruling of your chief legal officer [link - at bottom]  

"You or any other member may arrange for a special meeting of the members as provided in the bylaws. (See Article VIII, Section 4.)" 

In pursuing this avenue we wish to follow precisely that which the SECU bylaws require of any member. We must have your requirements in order to proceed.

Appreciate your prompt response to the initial request. Sorry for the misinterpretation; if you thought it was a complaint, it was not. 

Know you are busy, but again the procedures are not available in the branches, nor online. I can have someone pick them up directly from your office, if that would be more convenient.  

Look forward to receiving the information requested shortly. Thank you. 

Sincerely,
Jim Blaine, SECU member

 What could be causing the "hold up"

 

 

 

22 comments:

  1. Why held up? Cuz they’re not finished writing them yet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looks like they have placed you in the "Just another Member" catagory. Welcome to the club, they did that to the rest of us employees in September 2021.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Should employees be treated differently than the general membership?

      Delete
    2. They should get paid. Otherwise no.

      Delete
    3. Great question @9:26. There are some commenters who seem to think employees represent a special class of members. That is not the intent of most of us who engage with this blog.

      Delete
    4. they should take modules so they can learn what a credit union is and why they are different from a bank because it's obvious some don't, else they do, but just don't care ... doesn't fit the industry standard model.

      Delete
    5. They should get paid appropriately.

      Delete
    6. @8:12AM The modules are honestly a joke and pretty useless.

      Delete
    7. @12:14PM The membership wants rockstar service and employees but doesn't want to pay for them.

      Delete
  3. You'll know what you need to know when you know it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, and what’s wrong with that?

      Delete
    2. “approved information”

      Delete
  4. delay of game ... 15 yards!
    making it 4th down and a long shot ...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hurting female leadership by example.

    ReplyDelete
  6. do what we say, don't ask any questions, we know what is best for you ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 4:31 slight edit. You voted for us to make decisions. There will never be consensus in support of our decisions amount 3 million or do members. However, you have the opportunity to vote us out each year.

      Delete
    2. Did it take you all weekend to think of that?

      Delete
    3. Ref 7:22's response - no difference. Bottom line, tuning out member feedback/opposing views. Not something the board should be proud of but apparently they are. A house full of "yes men" and everyone else be quiet. -c

      Delete
    4. "However, you have the opportunity to vote us out each year."
      ... for now

      Delete
  7. don't you have her number?

    ReplyDelete