Saturday, March 16, 2024

N.C. Credit Union Division: "Get A Lawyer".

😎 Okay, so we "hired" the federal government as a legal advisor...

https://newyorkminute.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ncua-logo.jpg

Legal Opinions...

NCUA Legal Opinion: SUBJ: FCU Board of Directors Eligibility Requirements

DATE: May 26 1988

✅ "Due to the complexities of credit union operations, questions have been raised regarding the establishment of criteria for FCU members who seek to run for board election. As I mentioned to you, it has long been our position that, generally, the only eligibility requirements for FCU board membership are those contained in the FCU Act. That is, a long as an individual is a member (§111) and has not been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust (5205(d)), he or she is eligible to be elected as a director. There is one exception provided in the bylaws. Article VI, Section 7, permits the board, by resolution, to establish a minimum age requirement. This is essentially the recognition of a board's implied authority to set a restriction based on intellectual and legal competence."

"There are, however, no restrictions on the eligibility requirements that a nominating committee can use in selection candidates for office. We have previously stated that the nominating committee is free to set reasonable standards as to whom it will nominate. Failure to be nominated by the committee, though, does not preclude a member from running for office."

"As mentioned at the outset, the complexities of today' s credit union operations have caused credit union officials to question whether or not minimum qualifications should be placed upon individuals desiring to fill board positions, This is also a concern to NCUA since incompetence ultimately affects this Agency and the NCUSIF. We do not, however, believe that NCUA's position should change on this issue. While permitting officials to establish qualification standards may, at first glance, appear appropriate in the spirit of self management flexibility, it can also be counterproductive to the cooperative nature of credit unions and the self governing characteristics of credit union membership. Existing officials can use standards as a way of perpetuating their own positions or limiting board membership to their own clique."

Second Opinion Letter: October 18, 1994 [excerpt]

As stated in a September 20, 1991, letter from Hattie M. Ulan, Associate General Counsel:

"As long as an individual is a member of the "FCU" (Section 111 of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 1761) and has not been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust (Section 205(d) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 1785(d)) (or if he has been convicted of such a crime, the NCUA Board has waived the Section 205(d) prohibition), he is eligible for election to the board of directors. Article VI, Section 7 of the Standard FCU Bylaws also permits a board of directors to set a minimum age requirement."

"Any other limitations on eligibility for election would be impermissible."

✅ Third Opinion Letter: November 4, 1986 [excerpt]

Although a member may not be nominated by the nominating committee, he/she would still be-eligible to be nominated by petition or from the floor, as provided by the FCU's bylaws. 

Fourth Opinion Letter: January, 2012 [excerpt]

"i. Eligibility Requirements: The Act and the FCU Bylaws contain the only eligibility requirements for membership on an FCU’s board of directors, which are as follows:

  • (a) The individual must be a member of the FCU before distribution of ballots;
  • (b) the individual cannot have been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty or breach of trust unless the NCUA Board has waived the prohibition for the conviction; and
  • (c) the individual meets the minimum age requirement established under Article V, Section 7 of the FCU Bylaws.

Anyone meeting the three eligibility requirements may run for a seat on the board of directors if properly nominated."

There are a dozen more of these which you can look up at ncua.gov [just search "Legal opinions"]. You don't need to "hire a lawyer" to do that...

 

 

 

Friday, March 15, 2024

The North Carolina Credit Union Division Responds - Definitive Circularity?

 ... Esse Quam Videri?

Ms. Kristina Ray, Administrator, North Carolina Credit Union Division

cc: North Carolina Credit Union Commission

Dear Ms. Ray:

Thank you for your prompt response to our letter of March 11, 2024 [link]. In your response, all you provided was a copy of your September 18, 2023 letter which simply said:

 "As part of our investigation, the Division reviewed SECU's response and other information deemed necessary for reaching a determination.  Based on the review, the Division finds no apparent violation of law or rule under our authority by SECU; therefore we are closing your complaint."

We of course already had a copy of that letter, too. We are left with the highly implausible situation where you will not provide us with a copy of "our complaint", which you filed on our behalf. So, we remain in the dark about what you advised SECU, we were "complaining" about! Why will you not provide us with a copy of "our complaint"?

Without knowing what it is in our complaint, it is impossible to evaluate "the results" of your investigation, including the "other information deemed necessary for reaching a determination." (see above). Your opaqueness is not strengthening anyone's faith in our State government!

Again, this discussion began last July - nine months ago -  with concerns by SECU members over changes in election procedures and bylaws approved by the Credit Union Division. Those concerns are real, as you witnessed firsthand at the 2023 SECU Annual Meeting - when the SECU membership voted out all incumbent board members. The internal controversy continues as another election cycle approaches.

To accentuate the sense of urgency, the SECU Board has just announced additional plans to change SECU election procedures for the 2024 election cycle [see info here]. Perhaps the SECU Board plans to correct the failures of last year - which you have "determined" did not occur? But, probably not.

That one explicit, dangerous illegality which did occur in the 2023 SECU election cycle, was that the SECU Nominating Committee refused to permit a qualified, eligible SECU member to seek self-nomination as a candidate for the SECU Board. 

That refusal is unquestionably illegal under the SECU Bylaws, North Carolina Credit Union laws, and under the Federal Credit Union Act.

Ms. Ray, did your "determination" disagree with the above statement? Have you determined that North Carolina credit unions may deny eligible, qualified members the right to seek self, member nomination to serve as a credit union board?

Hope you will promptly respond to that simple question. Time is now truly of the essence. Much is at stake for the 3 million+ credit union members in North Carolina. 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Jean and Jim Blaine

March 15, 2024


... anybody read "The Trial" by Franz Kafka?