“Finance is a gun... ”
Comment on "The Godfather Mergers - Part1" [link] from the troll-itariat:
"Really big misread on this. You have it backwards. There is nothing in this for existing BECU members. Their capital is diluted by taking SAFE on, it will be a management distraction, and it will drop BECU’s OpEX from 3.43 to 3.30%"
Under the fair payout merger proposal, each SAFE FCU member receives @$1,639 and membership in the combined BECU. The combined capital ratio after the merger is a very strong 11% (the average for all CUs > $10 billion is 10.38% according to NCUA).
The trollish comments - "nothing in this for existing BECU members" and "it will be a management distraction" - are simply amateurish. Criticism of BECU management is completely unjustified. They're "making out like bandits", so to speak.
But our anonymouse troll saves the worst for last in decrying the fact that the proposed merger "will drop BECU’s OpEX from 3.43 to 3.30%"
Say what?... that the cost of operating BECU will be lowered from 3.43% to 3.30% is a bad thing? If you go to the grocery store and pay $3.30 for a pound of hamburger rather than pay $3.43, that's a bad thing? This little troll might want to get checked out for "financial microcephalia".
In case you would like the truth: SAFE FCU's cost of operations (troll talk - "OpEX") is a steady 2.50%, while BECU's cost of operations is a persistently rising 3.33% (according to NCUA). In other words, it costs the folks at BECU a third more in operating costs to run BECU, than the cost of running SAFE.
SAFE is more efficient than BECU and cost wise is the better value for members.
Well! So much for the ole "economies of scale" claim in hyping up mergers... at least in this case that's "SAFE to say"!